| |
in this issue
Victorian
unfair contract terms legislation and mandatory external dispute resolution
for credit providers – what you need to know
on
The Fair
Trading and Other Acts Amendment Act 2009 became law on 10 June 2009.
This Act:
-
extends the Victorian Fair Trading Act 1999 provisions
regarding unfair contract terms to include consumer credit contracts,
mortgages, guarantees, and leases from 11 June 2009
-
requires credit providers who provide UCCC regulated finance
to Victorian residents to belong to an ASIC approved external dispute
resolution scheme from 1 July 2009 (this is in addition to the existing
requirement to be a registered credit provider in Victoria). Lenders
who are not currently members of a scheme need to act promptly.
Victoria has
implemented these initiatives to cover the gap until the Commonwealth take
over of the regulation of credit.
read more...
|
|
 |
banking and finance update - june 2009
.
Victorian
unfair contract terms legislation and mandatory external dispute resolution
for credit providers – what you need to know
by Elise
Ivory
TheFair
Trading and Other Acts Amendment Act 2009 became law on 10 June 2009.
This Act:
-
extends the Victorian Fair Trading Act 1999 provisions
regarding unfair contract terms to include consumer credit contracts,
mortgages, guarantees, and leases from 11 June 2009
-
requires credit providers who provide UCCC regulated finance
to Victorian residents to belong to an ASIC approved external dispute
resolution scheme from 1 July 2009 (this is in addition to the existing
requirement to be a registered credit provider in Victoria). Lenders
who are not currently members of a scheme need to act promptly.
Victoria has
implemented these initiatives to cover the gap until the Commonwealth take
over of the regulation of credit.
Unfair
contracts
The Act
provides that an unfair term in a consumer credit contract is unenforceable.
Injunctions
preventing the use of unfair contract terms and orders in relation to such
terms may be applied for in the Supreme Court, County Court, or the
Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT).
The court or
VCAT can make a variety of orders in relation to unfair contract terms
including:
-
payments of damages or restitution
-
variation of the contract, refund of money paid under the
contract, or an order for the return of property
-
specific performance, rescission, rectification
-
an order that a provision cannot be enforced or that a debt
is, or is not, owing.
While the
Commonwealth legislation and the Victorian legislation are fairly similar,
there are some important differences. The table below highlights these
differences.
|
Provision |
Commonwealth legislation |
Victorian legislation |
|
Definition of ‘unfair’. |
A term
of a standard form contract is unfair if:
-
the term would cause a significant imbalance in the
parties’ rights and obligations arising under the contract
-
the term is not reasonably necessary to protect the
legitimate interests of the party advantaged by the term.
|
A term
in a consumer contract is to be regarded as unfair if in all the
circumstances, it causes a significant imbalance in the parties’
rights and obligations arising under the contract to the detriment
of the consumer. |
|
Definition of ‘standard form contract’. |
-
None
provided, but if a claimant states that a contract was a standard
form contract, it is up to the respondent to prove otherwise
-
There are certain
matters that court must take into account when determining
whether a contract is a 'standard form contract' including the
bargaining power of the parties, when the contract was prepared,
whether the contract was a 'take it, or leave it contract' and
whether the terms were negotiated.
|
-
A
consumer contract that has been drawn up for general use in a
particular industry, whether or not the contract differs from other
contracts used in that industry.
-
There
is also a presumption that a contract is a standard form contract
unless the contrary can be established.
|
|
Matters the court must take into account when determining
whether a term is unfair. |
Matters include:
-
the extent to which the term would cause, or whether there
is a substantial likelihood that the term would cause, detriment
(whether financial or otherwise) to a party if the clause was to
be applied or relied on
-
how transparent the clause is
-
the contract as a whole.
|
None
specified. |
|
Matters the court may take into account when determining
whether a term is unfair. |
Whether the clause allows one party (but not the other) to:
-
limit or avoid performance
-
terminate the contract
-
be penalised for breach of termination
-
vary the terms of the contract
-
renew or not renew
-
vary the upfront price payable without the right of the
other party to terminate
-
vary the goods or services to be supplied or the land to be
sold or granted
-
unilaterally determine that a breach has occurred
-
limit that party’s vicarious liability for its agents
-
assign to that other party’s detriment without the other
party’s consent
-
limit one party’s right to sue
-
limit the evidence one party can adduce in proceedings
relating to the contract
-
impose the evidential burden on the other party
Any other matters
referred to in the regulations.
|
Whether the term was individually negotiated.
Whether the term is prescribed by the regulations (none currently
prescribed).
Whether the term has the object or effect of permitting the supplier
to:
-
avoid or limit performance
-
terminate
-
penalise the consumer for breach or termination
-
vary the terms
-
renew or not renew
-
determine the price without allowing the consumer to
terminate
-
unilaterally vary the goods or services to be supplied
-
limit vicarious liability for its agents
-
assign the contract to the consumer’s detriment without the
consumer’s consent
-
limit the consumer’s right to sue
-
limit the evidence the consumer can lead in proceedings
-
impose the evidential burden on the consumer in court
proceedings.
|
|
Effect
if term is found to be ‘unfair’. |
An
unfair term of a standard form contract is void. |
An
unfair term in a consumer contract is unenforceable if the contract
is a consumer credit contract and void if the contract is any other
form of contract. |
|
Prescribed unfair terms |
None
currently prescribed. |
None
currently prescribed. It is an offence to use a prescribed unfair
contract term. |
|
Exceptions |
Exceptions include:
-
terms which define the main subject of the contract (i.e. a
consumer cannot buy goods and then later assert that they
changed their mind and it was unfair that they had to proceed
with the purchase, or borrowed money and then later claimed it
was unfair that the lender enforced the mortgage)
-
terms which set the upfront price payable under the
contract (ie the consideration for the supply or sale provided
it is disclosed at or before the contract is entered into) but
does not include amounts which are contingent on the occurrence
or non-occurrence of an event
-
terms required by law.
|
None
specified. |
|
What
contracts are impacted? |
All
standard form consumer contracts, being contracts for:
to an individual whose
acquisition of the goods, services or interest is wholly or
predominantly for personal, domestic or household use or
consumption.
Contracts which on or after 1 January 2010 are:
-
entered into
-
renewed, in relation to conduct occurring after the renewal
-
varied, in relation to conduct occurring after the
variation.
|
All
contracts to supply goods or services of a kind ordinarily acquired
for personal, domestic or household use or consumption, for the
purposes of the ordinary personal, domestic or household use or
consumption of those goods or services.
Contracts which on or after the day after the Bill receives royal
assent are:
|
Gadens
Lawyers can assist lenders review their documents to determine whether
any changes are required to avoid challenge as an unfair contract term. We
have already worked with Consumer Affairs Victoria reviewing credit contract
terms and so are uniquely placed to assist you.
Elise Ivory is a Senior Associate of Gadens Lawyers, Sydney
specialising
in Banking and Finance Law.
This
publication is provided to clients and correspondents for their
information on a complimentary basis.
The
information provided is a general guide only and Gadens Lawyers
accept no responsibility for people relying on this publication.
|
|